Development Incentives Explained 

Disclaimer

The information provided here is based on publicly available data and the current understanding of local policy. I strive for accuracy and transparency. If you identify an error or have additional information supported by reliable sources, I encourage you to reach out so it can be reviewed.

Responsible leadership requires facts, accountability, and open dialogue.

What Are TIFs and PILOTs? And Why Should You Care?

When you hear local officials talk about “incentives” for development or “affordable housing,” they are often referring to two financial tools: Tax Increment Financing, known as TIF, and Payments In Lieu Of Taxes, known as PILOTs.

Here is what those tools actually mean for taxpayers.

Tax Increment Financing

A TIF is a public financing mechanism used to support development within a designated area.

Here is how it works:

• A baseline property tax value is established when the TIF district is created.

• For a defined period, often 20 to 30 years, any increase in property tax revenue above that baseline is redirected into a special fund.

• That redirected revenue may be used to pay for project related costs such as infrastructure, utilities, site preparation, or other improvements tied to the development.

• The original baseline tax revenue continues flowing to schools and other taxing bodies, but they do not receive the incremental growth during the life of the TIF.

Supporters argue that TIFs help stimulate development in areas that might not otherwise attract investment. Critics argue they redirect future tax growth away from general public services for many years.

Payments In Lieu Of Taxes

A PILOT is an agreement in which a developer or entity makes negotiated payments instead of paying the full amount of property taxes that would normally be assessed.

Key points:

• PILOTs are commonly used for affordable housing projects, industrial recruitment, and large scale developments.

• These agreements are often administered through industrial development boards or other development authorities depending on the jurisdiction.

• The payment amount is negotiated and is typically lower than the full market tax obligation.

• Depending on how the agreement is structured, schools and other taxing bodies may receive less revenue than they would under a standard tax assessment.

• PILOT agreements can last many years, locking in reduced or modified revenue streams over time.

Why Should You Care?

It Affects Long Term Revenue Growth

When projected tax growth is redirected through a TIF or reduced through a PILOT, local governments must adjust. That can mean reprioritizing spending, reallocating funds, or identifying alternative revenue sources to meet ongoing obligations.

It Impacts Public Services

Schools
Because incremental tax growth may be redirected or reduced, school systems may not benefit from the full increase in property values within incentive areas.

Infrastructure
If development projections do not materialize as expected, communities can be left with infrastructure commitments that outlast the projected revenue growth.

County Budget
Long term incentive agreements can shape county finances for decades and limit flexibility for future leaders.

It Is a Bet on Future Performance

TIFs and some PILOT structures rely on projections of future growth. If development underperforms expectations, the financial benefits may be smaller than anticipated.

Oversight and Transparency Matter

TIF districts and PILOT agreements are approved through public bodies, often with involvement from development authorities. However, long term performance reviews, financial modeling assumptions, and public reporting can vary by jurisdiction. Taxpayers should expect clear metrics and ongoing evaluation.

It Raises Questions of Fairness

When certain projects receive modified tax treatment, neighboring homeowners and small businesses continue paying under standard assessments. Voters should consider whether incentives are being applied selectively and whether projects would proceed without them.

Bottom Line for Voters

Incentives are not free. They change how tax revenue flows and how risk is allocated.

Before supporting or opposing any incentive, voters should ask:

• How much projected revenue is being redirected or reduced?

• For how long?

• What protections exist if projections fall short?

• Who ultimately bears the financial risk?

Responsible growth requires transparency, measurable outcomes, and fiscal discipline.

4

A TIF establishes a baseline property tax value for a designated area at the time the district is created.

If development occurs and property values increase, the additional tax revenue above that original baseline, known as the tax increment, is redirected into a special fund associated with the project.

That incremental revenue is typically used to pay for project related costs such as infrastructure, utilities, or site improvements rather than flowing into general funds for schools, roads, or public safety during the life of the TIF.

Supporters argue that this structure can help make certain projects financially possible.

The concern is this:

For 10, 20, sometimes even 30 years, the future growth in property tax revenue from that area may not flow through the normal budgeting process. Instead, it is committed to the project until the TIF period ends.

This means the community may not fully benefit from the increased property values during that period.

Payment In Lieu Of Taxes (PILOT)

PILOT Agreements

A PILOT agreement allows a developer or property owner to make negotiated payments instead of paying the full property taxes that would normally be assessed.

Instead of paying taxes based on the full market value of the property, the project pays a reduced or structured payment for a defined period of time.

The difference between the negotiated payment and the standard property tax obligation represents revenue that may not flow through the normal property tax system during the life of the agreement. That can affect the funding available for schools, roads, and other public services.

These agreements are commonly used in affordable housing developments, industrial recruitment, and large scale projects.

Taxpayers must ALWAYS be PRIORITY ONE.